Allamel-Raffin Catherine & Jean-Luc Gangloff. 2015. Some Remarks about the Definitions of Contingentism and Inevitabilism, Science as it could have been, A. Pickering, L. Soler, E. Trizio (eds.), Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh University Press, pp. 99-113.
Arthur, William Brian. 1988. Self-reinforcing mechanisms in economics. In The economy as an evolving complex system, P. Anderson, K. J. Arrow & D. Pines (eds.), Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 9-33.
Arthur, William Brian. 1989. Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical Events. The Economic Journal, 99/394, 116-131.
Beatty, John. 2016. What are narratives good for? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C, 58, 33-40.
Bolinska, Agnes. 2018. Synthetic versus analytic approaches to protein and DNA structure determination. Biology and Philosophy, 33, 26.
Callon, Michel. 1994. Is science a public good? Science, Technology, & Human Values ,19(4), 395-424.
Campbell, D. T. 1986. Science policy from a naturalistic sociological epistemology. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1984, 2, 14-29.
Chang, Hasok. 2004. Inventing Temperature: Measurement and Scientific Progress, Oxford Studies in the Philosophy of Science. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.
Chang, Hasok. 2012a. Is Water H20? Evidence, Realism and Pluralism, Dordrecht: Springer, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 293.
Chang, Hasok. 2012b. Beyond Case-Studies: History as Philosophy. In Integrating History and Philosophy of Science, Seymour Mauskopf & Tad Schmaltz (eds.), Dordrecht: Springer, 109-124.
Chang, Hasok. 2015. Cultivating Contingency: A Case for Scientific Pluralism. In Science as it Could Have Been. Discussing the Contingency / Inevitability Problem, Léna Soler, Emiliano Trizio & Andrew Pickering (eds.), Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press, 359-382.
Cook, Roy T. 2013. Canonicity and Normativity in Massive, Serialized, Collaborative Fiction. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 71(3), 271-276.
Cushing, James T. 1994. Quantum Mechanics: Historical Contingency and the Copenhagen Hegemony, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
David, P. A. 1975. Technical choice innovation and economic growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
David, P. A. 1985. Clio and the economics of QWERTY. American Economic Review, 75(2), 332-337.
David, P. A. 1994. Why are institutions the “carriers of history”? Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 5 (2): 205-220.
David, P. A. 2001. Path dependence, its critics and the quest for “historical economics”. In Evolution and path dependence in economic ideas, P. Garrouste and S. Ioannides (eds.), Cheltenham: Elgar, 15-40.
David, P. A., and P. Dasgupta. 1994. Toward a new economics of science. Research Policy, 23(5), 487-521.
Feferman, S. 1977. Categorical Foundations and Foundations of Category Theory. In Butts R. & Hintikka, J., Logic, Foundations of Mathematics and Computability Theory, Dordrecht: Reidel, 149-169.
Fuller, Steve. 2005. The intellectual. Cambridge: Icon.
Gavroglu, K. & Simões, A. 2012. Neither Physics nor Chemistry: A History of Quantum Chemistry. MIT Press.
Hacking, Ian. 1992. The Self-Vindication of the Laboratory Sciences. In Science as Practice and Culture, Andrew Pickering (ed.), Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 29-64.
Heinzmann, Gerhard & Mark Van Atten. 2019. Révisionnisme mathématique : l’enjeu constructif. In A. Arana, M. Panza, F. Poggiolesi et P. Wagner (eds.), Précis de Philosophie des Mathematiques et de la Logique, Paris, à paraître.
Imbert, Cyrille & Anouk Barberousse. 2013a. Le tournant computationnel et l'innovation théorique. In La philosophie de la physique : d’aujourd’hui à demain, Soazig Le Bihan (ed.), Vuibert.
Imbert, Cyrille & Anouk Barberousse. 2013b. New mathematics for old physics: The case of lattice fluids. Studies in History and Philosophy of Physics, 44(3), August, 231-241.
Imbert, Cyrille & Anouk Barberousse. 2014. Recurring models and sensitivity to computational constraints, The Monist, special issue Models and Simulations edited by Paul Humphreys, July, 97(3), 259-279.
Jolink, Albert, & Jack Vromen. 2001. Path Dependence in Scientific Evolution. In Garrouste, Pierre & Stavros Ioannides (eds.), Evolution and Path Dependence in Economic Ideas, Northampton: Elgar, 205-224.
Kellert, Stephen H., Helen E. Longino, & C. Kenneth Waters (eds.). 2006. Scientific Pluralism, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 19, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Kidd, Ian J. 2011. The contingency of science and the future of philosophy. Essays in Philosophy, 12, 312-328.
Kidd, Ian James. 2013. Historical Contingency and the Impact of Scientific Imperialism. International Studies in Philosophy of Science, 27(3), 317-326.
Kidd, Ian James. 2016. Inevitability, Contingency, and Epistemic Humility. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 55, 12-19.
Kidd, Ian J. 2017. Other Histories, Other Sciences. An essay review of Science as it Could Have Been. Discussing the Contingency / Inevitability Problem, Léna Soler, Emiliano Trizio & Andrew Pickering (eds.), Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press, 2015. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 61, 57-60.
Kinzel, Katherina. 2014 (unpublished). Could the Results of Our Science Have Been Different? Contingency and Inevitability in the Philosophy and Historiography of Science, PhD thesis, University of Vienna, Austria.
Kinzel, Katherina. 2015a. State of the Field: Are the Results of Science Contingent or Inevitable? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 52, 55-66.
Kinzel, Katherina. 2015b. Narrative and Evidence: How Can Case Studies from the History of Science Support Claims in the Philosophy of Science? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 49, 48-57.
Kinzel, Katherina. 2016a. Review of Science as it Could Have Been. Discussing the Contingency / Inevitability Problem, Léna Soler, Emiliano Trizio & Andrew Pickering (eds.), Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press, 2015. Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science, 6(2), 319-323.
Kinzel, Katherina. 2016b. Counterfactuals, causes, and contingency in the history of science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 60, 92-96.
Kinzel, Katherina. 2017. Wilhelm Windelband and the Problem of Relativism, British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 25(1), 84-107.
Kinzel, Katherina. 2018. Inner Experience and Articulation. Wilhelm Dilthey’s Foundational Project and the Charge of Psychologism, HOPOS. Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 8, 347-375.
Kinzel, Katherina, & Martin Kusch. 2018. De-idealizing Disagreement, Rethinking Relativism. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 26(1), 40-71.
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1962/1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1969/1970. Posface to The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1977/1990. La tension essentielle. Tradition et changement dans les sciences, Paris : Gallimard, Bibliothèque des sciences humaines, 424-449.
Kusch, Martin, Katherina Kinzel, Johannes Steizinger, & Niels Wildschut (eds.). 2019. The Emergence of Relativism: German Thought from Herder to National Socialism. London: Routledge.
Liebowitz, S., and Margolis, S. 1995. Path dependence, lock-in, and history. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization,1(1), 205-226.
Martin, Joseph D. 2013. Is the Contingentist/Inevitabilist Debate a Matter of Degrees? Philosophy of Science, 80(5), 919-930.
Martin, Joseph D. 2016. A Paean to Contingency. Metascience 25(3), 437-441. Essay review: Léna Soler, Emiliano Trizio, and Andrew Pickering, eds., Science as it Could Have Been: Discussing the Contingency/Inevitability Problem, Pittsburgh, 2015.
Martin, Joseph D. & Agnes Bolinska. 2019 (in revision). Negotiating History: Contingency, Canonicity, and Case Studies. Winner of the 2019 IUHPST Essay Prize in History and Philosophy of Science.
Morgan, Mary, & Norton Wise (eds.). 2017. Narrative Science. Special Issue: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 62.
Peacock, Mark. 2009. Path-dependence in the Production of Scientific Knowledge. Social Epistemology, 23(2), 105-124.
Pickering, Andrew. 1984. Constructing Quarks: A Sociological History of Particle Physics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Pickering, Andrew. 1995. The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Pickering, Andrew. 2015. Science, Contingency, and Ontology. In Science as it Could Have Been. Discussing the Contingency / Inevitability Problem, Léna Soler, Emiliano Trizio & Andrew Pickering (eds.), Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press, 177-128.
Ruphy, Stéphanie. 2013. Pluralismes scientifiques. Enjeux épistémiques et métaphysiques, Paris : Hermann.
Schickore, Jutta. 2011. More Thoughts on HPS: Another 20 Years Later. Perspectives on Science, 19(4), 453-481.
Soler, Léna. 2006. Contingence ou inévitabilité des résultats de notre science? Philosophiques, 33(2), 363-378.
Soler, Léna. 2008a. Are the Results of Our Science Contingent or Inevitable? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 39(2), 221-229.
Soler, Léna. 2008b. Revealing the Analytical Structure and Some Intrinsic Major Difficulties of the Contingentist/Inevitabilist Issue. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 39(2), 230-241.
Soler, Léna. 2009. Introduction à l’épistémologie, seconde édition revue et augmentée, Ellipses.
Soler, Léna. 2011a. Tacit Aspects of Experimental Practices: Analytical Tools and Epistemological Consequences. European Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 1(3), 394-433.
Soler, Léna. 2011b. Les expérimentateurs sont-ils substituables les uns aux autres ? (Opacité des pratiques expérimentales, fragmentation de l’expertise, désaccords irrésolus entre praticiens : quelles conséquences épistémologiques ?). Le Philosophoire, La science, 35, printemps, 65-113.
Soler, Léna. 2012a. The Solidity of Scientific Achievements: Structure of the Problem, Difficulties, Philosophical Implications. In Characterizing the Robustness of Science after the Practice Turn in Philosophy of Science, Léna Soler, Emiliano Trizio, Thomas Nickles & William C. Wimsatt (eds.), Dordrecht: Springer, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 392, 1-60.
Soler, Léna. 2012b. Robustness of Results and Robustness of Derivations: The Internal Architecture of a Solid Experimental Proof. In Characterizing the Robustness of Science after the Practice Turn in Philosophy of Science, Léna Soler, Emiliano Trizio, Thomas Nickles & William C. Wimsatt (eds.), Dordrecht: Springer, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 392, 227-266.
Soler, Léna. 2014. Pluralité des paradigmes et dimensions de l’incommensurabilité en physique : ce que changent les révolutions scientifiques. In Innovations théoriques en STAPS et implications pratiques en EPS. Les sciences du sport en mouvement, Matthieu Quidu (ed.), Paris : L’Harmattan, collection « Le mouvement des savoirs », 330-369.
Soler, Léna. 2015a. The Contingentist / Inevitabilist Debate: Current State of Play, Paradigmatic Forms of Problems and Arguments, Connections to More Familiar Philosophical Themes. In Science as it Could Have Been. Discussing the Contingency / Inevitability Problem, Léna Soler, Emiliano Trizio & Andrew Pickering (eds.), Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press, 1-44.
Soler, Léna. 2015b. Why Contingentists Should Not Care about the Inevitabilist Demand to “Put-Up-or-Shut-Up”: A Dialogic reconstruction of the Argumentative Network. In Science as it Could Have Been. Discussing the Contingency / Inevitability Problem, Léna Soler, Emiliano Trizio & Andrew Pickering (eds.), Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press, 45-98.
Soler, Léna. 2015c. Shifts Introduced by the Practice Turn in Philosophy, History and Social Studies of Science. In The Practical Turn in Philosophy of Science, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the International Academy of the Philosophy of Science, Pont-à-Mousson / France, 10-14 September 2014, Evandro Agazzi & Gerhard Heinzmann (eds.), Milan: FrancoAngeli, Epistemologia, 57-80.
Soler, Léna. 2018 (inédit HDR). La science telle qu’elle aurait pu se faire ? Contingence ou inévitabilité des résultats de notre science.
Soler, Léna (ed.). 2006b. Philosophie de la physique: dialogue à plusieurs voix autour de controverses contemporaines et classiques (entre Michel Bitbol, Bernard d’Espagnat, Pascal Engel, Paul Gochet, Léna Soler et Hervé Zwirn), Paris : L’Harmattan.
Soler, Léna & Howard Sankey (eds.). 2008. Are the Results of Our Science Contingent or Inevitable? A Symposium Devoted to the Contingency Issue. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 39, 220-264.
Soler, Léna, Sjoerd Zwart, Vincent Israel-Jost & Michael Lynch. 2014. Introduction: Science After the Practice Turn in the Philosophy, History, and Social Studies of Science. In Science After the Practice Turn in the Philosophy, History, and Social Studies of Science, Léna Soler, Sjoerd Zwart, Michael Lynch & Vincent Israël-Jost (eds.), Studies in the Philosophy of Science 14, New-York and London: Routledge, 1-43.
Soler, Léna, Emiliano Trizio & Andrew Pickering (eds.). 2015. Science as it Could Have Been. Discussing the Contingency / Inevitability Problem, Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press.
Tambolo, Luca. 2018. So close no matter how far: counterfactuals in history of science and the inevitability/contingency controversy. Synthese, 1-31.
Zwart, Sjoerd D., & M. J. de Vries. 2016. Methodological Classification of Innovative Engineering Projects. In M. Franssen, P. E. Vermaas, P. Kroes, & A. W. M. Meijers (eds.), Philosophy of Technology after the Empirical Turn, Springer International Publishing, 219-248. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33717-3_13
Zwart, Sjoerd D., M. Franssen, & P. Kroes. 2018. Practical Inference—A Formal Analysis. In A. Fritzsche & S. J. Oks (eds.), The Future of Engineering: The Future of Engineering: Philosophical Foundations, Ethical Problems and Application Cases, Springer International Publishing, 33-52.
Zwart, Sjoerd D. Forthcoming. Prescriptive Engineering Knowledge. In D. M. Michelfelder & N. Doorn (eds.), Routlege.